Message170647
I'm not against making this change, but I'm curious - why would a handler do clean-up I/O in its release() method (which is just for releasing the I/O lock) where it could just as easily override the close() method to do the same thing? It seems like programmer error to be doing any I/O in a handler after close() is called on it. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-09-18 14:49:31 | vinay.sajip | set | recipients:
+ vinay.sajip, ncoghlan |
2012-09-18 14:49:31 | vinay.sajip | set | messageid: <1347979771.49.0.846198686889.issue15960@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-09-18 14:49:31 | vinay.sajip | link | issue15960 messages |
2012-09-18 14:49:30 | vinay.sajip | create | |
|