This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author sbt
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, jcea, pitrou, sbt, skrah
Date 2012-09-18.10:47:49
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1347965270.12.0.195762674033.issue15903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Then the view owns a reference to the bytes object. But that does not
> solve the problem that writable memoryviews based on a readonly object
> might be hanging around.

How about doing

    PyObject_GetBuffer(b, &buf, PyBUF_WRITABLE);
    view = PyMemoryView_FromBuffer(&buf);
    // readinto view
    PyBuffer_Release(&buf);

Would attempts to access a "leaked" reference to view now result in ValueError("operation forbidden on released memoryview object")?  If so then I think this would be safe.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-09-18 10:47:50sbtsetrecipients: + sbt, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, skrah
2012-09-18 10:47:50sbtsetmessageid: <1347965270.12.0.195762674033.issue15903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-09-18 10:47:49sbtlinkissue15903 messages
2012-09-18 10:47:49sbtcreate