Message169861
That's fine by me. I guess what's more important to me is that "code object" have a central, linkable definition *somewhere* (and not necessarily that this somewhere be a glossary entry). That way references to code object in the docs can link to a definition in the same way that we link to definitions of other words, functions, etc.
I was also planning on indexing the word more properly. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-09-05 06:01:42 | chris.jerdonek | set | recipients:
+ chris.jerdonek, rhettinger, terry.reedy, docs@python |
2012-09-05 06:01:42 | chris.jerdonek | set | messageid: <1346824902.67.0.860978238097.issue15476@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-09-05 06:01:42 | chris.jerdonek | link | issue15476 messages |
2012-09-05 06:01:41 | chris.jerdonek | create | |
|