Author ezio.melotti
Recipients barry, ezio.melotti, jcea, petri.lehtinen, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2012-08-29.07:53:33
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1346226814.15.0.973663332517.issue15802@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
+                if int(groups[0]) == int(previous_groups[0]):
+                    self.assertGreaterEqual(int(groups[1]), int(previous_groups[1]),

This checks that
  int(groups[1]) >= int(previous_groups[1]) if int(groups[0]) == int(previous_groups[0])
whereas the previous version (with the int() fixed) checked that
  int(groups[1]) >= (previous_groups[1]) or groups[0] != groups[1].

Was the previous check nonsensical apart from the wrong usage of int()?
Note that even the indexes you used are different (I haven't checked what those values actually are though).
History
Date User Action Args
2012-08-29 07:53:34ezio.melottisetrecipients: + ezio.melotti, barry, jcea, r.david.murray, petri.lehtinen, serhiy.storchaka
2012-08-29 07:53:34ezio.melottisetmessageid: <1346226814.15.0.973663332517.issue15802@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-08-29 07:53:33ezio.melottilinkissue15802 messages
2012-08-29 07:53:33ezio.melotticreate