Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, georg.brandl, loewis, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, skrah, vstinner
Date 2012-08-19.13:13:57
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1345381851.3379.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <CADiSq7fwsK-9ZRMqKpESDq-ivzshCsKjfEe+-Bu4=V0EGajVEg@mail.gmail.com>
Content
> I guess the analogy with bytes objects is that UCS-2 code points can be
> handled as 16-bit integer objects.
> 
> If we're going to do a programmatic deprecation now, that's the only
> alternative typecode currently available. Do we want to recommend that? Or
> do we want to postpone programmatic deprecation until we add a 2-byte code
> point type code for 3.4?

I don't understand. If you want to handle 16-bit integers, you already
have the "h" and "H" type codes.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-08-19 13:14:18pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, vstinner, Arfrever, skrah, meador.inge, python-dev
2012-08-19 13:13:57pitroulinkissue13072 messages
2012-08-19 13:13:57pitroucreate