This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients Rostyslav.Dzinko, benjamin.peterson, docs@python, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date 2012-08-17.20:18:44
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1345234725.38.0.207786420347.issue15718@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
In #12159, Victor correctly labelled this an implementation (IE, CPython) detail (limitation). I don't believe any implementation has to limit the range of len(). So the question is whether we should add a CPython implementation limit note, including the possibility of OverflowError, and if so, to both len() and __len__() entries. I am not sure of the current doc policy.

The second sentence of the len entry is out of date. " The argument may be a sequence (string, tuple or list) or a mapping (dictionary)." Sets and any collections with a size (__len__ method) can also be arguments. I am not sure how to revise that either.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-08-17 20:18:45terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, georg.brandl, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, docs@python, Rostyslav.Dzinko
2012-08-17 20:18:45terry.reedysetmessageid: <1345234725.38.0.207786420347.issue15718@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-08-17 20:18:44terry.reedylinkissue15718 messages
2012-08-17 20:18:44terry.reedycreate