Message 167993 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	Arfrever, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, loewis, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, skrah, vstinner
Date	2012-08-11.19:09:31
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1344712171.76.0.777997948725.issue15573@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I can see value in adopting the abstraction approach, but it's not part of this issue. That problem already existed when using memoryview in 3.2, we can wait until 3.4 to fix it. There's an actual, concrete regression in 3.3 that may break code, and comparing with memcmp() when the format strings match is enough to fix it.

I can see value in adopting the abstraction approach, but it's not part of this issue. That problem already existed when using memoryview in 3.2, we can wait until 3.4 to fix it.

There's an actual, concrete regression in 3.3 that may break code, and comparing with memcmp() when the format strings match is enough to fix it.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-08-11 19:09:31	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, loewis, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, Arfrever, skrah, meador.inge, python-dev
2012-08-11 19:09:31	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <1344712171.76.0.777997948725.issue15573@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-08-11 19:09:31	ncoghlan	link	issue15573 messages
2012-08-11 19:09:31	ncoghlan	create