Message167348
> > Why not add a is_nan() method to float numbers instead?
>
> Do you mean replacing math.isnan(x) by x.is_nan() to avoid the issue
> altogether? I'm not sure that's possible given that math just wraps
> the C library.
Yup. By calling x.is_nan() you would by construction get an
implementation that's correct for x's type. If x is a float, it would
obviously re-use math.isnan() (or have a similar implementation). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-08-03 19:49:31 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, mark.dickinson, steven.daprano, skrah |
2012-08-03 19:49:31 | pitrou | link | issue15544 messages |
2012-08-03 19:49:30 | pitrou | create | |
|