This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients mark.dickinson, meador.inge, pitrou, skrah, vstinner
Date 2012-08-01.12:45:09
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> The diff between b9558df8cc58 and default with array_revert_pep393.patch
> applied is small, but I noticed that in some places you switched back to
> Py_UNICODE typecode and in others not.

I just copied code from Python 3.2, I forgot to update typecode type
(Py_UNICODE => char). I attach a new patch which changes also the
documentation of the "u" format.
File name Uploaded
array_revert_pep393-2.patch vstinner, 2012-08-01.12:45:07
Date User Action Args
2012-08-01 12:45:11vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, mark.dickinson, pitrou, skrah, meador.inge
2012-08-01 12:45:09vstinnerlinkissue13072 messages
2012-08-01 12:45:09vstinnercreate