Message 165928 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	tati_alchueyr
Recipients	belopolsky, ezio.melotti, flox, georg.brandl, tati_alchueyr
Date	2012-07-20.14:00:26
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1342792833.39.0.39184693237.issue9914@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Yesterday I've studied this problem with flavio.ribeiro, and we've started "solving" it. The result of our progress is available at: issue5758_trace_execute_other_modules_main_v0.patch The problem of our approach is that any code outside the condition "if __name__ == '__main__'" will be run twice, as we used imp.load_source to obtain trace's analyzed code and redefine sys.modules['__main__']. In order to provide a better solution, we were considering using lazy module import, e.g: http://code.activestate.com/recipes/473888-lazy-module-imports/ Any thoughts on this?

Yesterday I've studied this problem with flavio.ribeiro, and we've started "solving" it. The result of our progress is available at:
issue5758_trace_execute_other_modules_main_v0.patch

The problem of our approach is that any code outside the condition "if __name__ == '__main__'" will be run twice, as we used imp.load_source to obtain trace's analyzed code and redefine sys.modules['__main__'].

In order to provide a better solution, we were considering using lazy module import, e.g:
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/473888-lazy-module-imports/

Any thoughts on this?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-07-20 14:00:33	tati_alchueyr	set	recipients: + tati_alchueyr, georg.brandl, belopolsky, ezio.melotti, flox
2012-07-20 14:00:33	tati_alchueyr	set	messageid: <1342792833.39.0.39184693237.issue9914@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-07-20 14:00:28	tati_alchueyr	link	issue9914 messages
2012-07-20 14:00:27	tati_alchueyr	create