Message165196
I was told some time ago that it was documentation changes. And, if I
remember correctly CONTINUE (100) was not ignored, it was actually broken.
Data was being read from stdin when a CONTINUE was received and this should
never happen based on RFC 2616, because there will never be any data to
read.
~Carl
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:15 PM, André Cruz <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> André Cruz <andre@cabine.org> added the comment:
>
> Can anyone confirm what is missing for this patch to be committed?
>
> Is it just test and documentation changes or is something wrong with the
> code changes as well?
>
> ----------
> nosy: +edevil
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1346874>
> _______________________________________
> |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-07-10 16:20:50 | Carl.Nobile | set | recipients:
+ Carl.Nobile, nnorwitz, terry.reedy, jjlee, orsenthil, cdwave, rharris, edevil, nikratio |
2012-07-10 16:20:49 | Carl.Nobile | link | issue1346874 messages |
2012-07-10 16:20:49 | Carl.Nobile | create | |
|