Author ncoghlan
Recipients Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, borja.ruiz, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, spiv
Date 2012-07-08.06:42:26
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1341729747.23.0.289902482076.issue7897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
As another in-the-standard-library uses case: my additions to the ipaddress test suite are really crying out for parameterised test support.

My current solution is adequate for coverage and debugging purposes (a custom assert applied to multiple values in a test case), but has the known limitations of that approach (specifically, only the first failing case gets reported rather than all failing cases, which can sometimes slow down the debugging process).
History
Date User Action Args
2012-07-08 06:42:27ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, spiv, exarkun, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, Yaroslav.Halchenko, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, borja.ruiz
2012-07-08 06:42:27ncoghlansetmessageid: <1341729747.23.0.289902482076.issue7897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-07-08 06:42:26ncoghlanlinkissue7897 messages
2012-07-08 06:42:26ncoghlancreate