This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author flox
Recipients bethard, flox, mapleoin, nstiurca, r.david.murray, tshepang
Date 2012-07-07.09:21:22
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1341652883.39.0.751341292225.issue15125@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I don't see a valid use case to support "-" in the name of the positional argument.

IMHO, it should raise an error (probably a ValueError) for the add_argument in this case ...


Or we keep it as-is and close as wont-fix: if the op wants to pass "foo-bar" for the name of the positional argument ... it is his problem.
He can retrieve the value if he really want, with something like:
getattr(args, 'foo-bar')

In this case a single note in the documentation about using valid Python identifier for the names could be enough.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-07-07 09:21:23floxsetrecipients: + flox, bethard, r.david.murray, tshepang, nstiurca, mapleoin
2012-07-07 09:21:23floxsetmessageid: <1341652883.39.0.751341292225.issue15125@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-07-07 09:21:22floxlinkissue15125 messages
2012-07-07 09:21:22floxcreate