Author christian.heimes
Recipients Arfrever, christian.heimes, loewis, pitrou, rhettinger, vstinner
Date 2012-06-28.09:05:03
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <4FEC1E38.6010507@cheimes.de>
In-reply-to <20120628075449.Horde.nsEAfUlCcOxP6-Gp3T3WMyA@webmail.df.eu>
Content
Am 28.06.2012 07:54, schrieb Martin v. Löwis:
> 
> Martin v. Löwis <martin@v.loewis.de> added the comment:
> 
>> a) my patch handles the fork() issue correctly
> 
> If the system has urandom, yes.

That's the easy and trivial case. It also handles fork() by storing the
PID and comparing it to os.getpid() whenever the RNG is acquired.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-06-28 09:05:07christian.heimessetrecipients: + christian.heimes, loewis, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, Arfrever
2012-06-28 09:05:06christian.heimeslinkissue15206 messages
2012-06-28 09:05:03christian.heimescreate