Message 163960 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	skrah
Recipients	aklauer, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, jcea, loewis, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date	2012-06-25.12:27:08
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<20120625122706.GA14593@sleipnir.bytereef.org>
In-reply-to	<1340625349.4.0.373024445565.issue10142@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Jes??s Cea Avi??n <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > Stefan, I am confused with your comments. The FreeBSD bug report you linked to had a test case attached. The test case uses errno == ENXIO. I could not reproduce the failure, so in my first comment I questioned whether the failures in test_posix were caused by that particular bug. Then I noticed that the test_posix traceback shows errno == 25 == ENOTTY. So I ran the test case with errno == ENOTTY and I could reproduce the bug. In short, I think you linked to the right bug after all. :)

Jes??s Cea Avi??n <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Stefan, I am confused with your comments.

The FreeBSD bug report you linked to had a test case attached. The test case
uses errno == ENXIO. I could not reproduce the failure, so in my *first* comment
I questioned whether the failures in test_posix were caused by that particular
bug.

Then I noticed that the test_posix traceback shows errno == 25 == ENOTTY.
So I ran the test case with errno == ENOTTY and I *could* reproduce the
bug.

In short, I think you linked to the right bug after all. :)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-06-25 12:27:09	skrah	set	recipients: + skrah, loewis, georg.brandl, rhettinger, terry.reedy, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, python-dev, aklauer
2012-06-25 12:27:08	skrah	link	issue10142 messages
2012-06-25 12:27:08	skrah	create