Author ncoghlan
Recipients Arfrever, brett.cannon, eric.araujo, eric.smith, eric.snow, lemburg, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev
Date 2012-06-25.00:40:02
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
Given Antoine's other change to the build process to fix the bootstrapping problem, I'm OK with leaving it up to anyone hacking on to remember that they need to run make if they want the interpreter to see any of their changes.

Unlike the C accelerator cases, it's not possible for the two implementations to get out of sync on the buildbots, so running the tests twice would just be a convenience change for anyone hacking on rather than being needed for correctness.

That said, if someone created a new issue and posted a patch to run the tests twice, I wouldn't object - a classic case of +0 :)
Date User Action Args
2012-06-25 00:40:04ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, lemburg, brett.cannon, pitrou, eric.smith, eric.araujo, Arfrever, python-dev, eric.snow
2012-06-25 00:40:04ncoghlansetmessageid: <>
2012-06-25 00:40:03ncoghlanlinkissue14657 messages
2012-06-25 00:40:02ncoghlancreate