Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients Arfrever, Yury.Selivanov, benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, larry, neologix, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2012-06-22.19:22:52
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1340392973.52.0.894129608243.issue14626@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> > http://bugs.python.org/review/14626/diff/5182/Doc/library/os.rst#newcode1210
> Doc/library/os.rst:1210: using it will raise a
> :exc:`NotImplementedError`.
> Same as above: would it make sense to ignore the arg if follow_symlinks
> is not supported, but the fact is irrelevant because the system doesn't
> support symlinks at all?

And what if the system supports symlink and doesn't support
at-functions, follow_symlinks=False and file is not symlink. Should it
be NotImplementedError?
History
Date User Action Args
2012-06-22 19:22:53serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, gvanrossum, larry, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, r.david.murray, neologix, Yury.Selivanov, rosslagerwall
2012-06-22 19:22:53serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1340392973.52.0.894129608243.issue14626@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-06-22 19:22:52serhiy.storchakalinkissue14626 messages
2012-06-22 19:22:52serhiy.storchakacreate