Message 163063 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	Ramchandra Apte, eric.araujo, michael.foord, ncoghlan, r.david.murray
Date	2012-06-17.12:30:45
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1339936246.51.0.17749590433.issue14215@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I'm expecting the "pep2pyramid.py" part to change at the very least. However, back on topic, I actually hit the limits of my knowledge of the PEP build process reading that script. As near as I can tell, PEP 0 should have the same "title" information as is available for the other PEPs. It does appear the individual PEPs and the index do use differently templates though, so that may be the source of the discrepancy.

I'm expecting the "pep2pyramid.py" part to change at the very least.

However, back on topic, I actually hit the limits of my knowledge of the PEP build process reading that script. 

As near as I can tell, PEP 0 should have the same "title" information as is available for the other PEPs. It does appear the individual PEPs and the index do use differently templates though, so that may be the source of the discrepancy.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-06-17 12:30:46	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, Ramchandra Apte
2012-06-17 12:30:46	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <1339936246.51.0.17749590433.issue14215@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-06-17 12:30:45	ncoghlan	link	issue14215 messages
2012-06-17 12:30:45	ncoghlan	create