➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author fijall
Recipients arigo, christian.heimes, fijall, hynek, loewis, ncoghlan, pitrou
Date 2012-06-15.07:50:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAK5idxRFPHzdKCx0T+ifYwcwxApHTv35_WGVVK-Ken8AXk17+w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <4FDAE87B.30908@v.loewis.de>
Content 
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Martin v. Löwis <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:

>
> Martin v. Löwis <martin@v.loewis.de> added the comment:
>
> > To repeat, the specific feature being proposed for retention is:
>
> To repeat, no use case has been demonstrated for that function. It
> has been added because it was fun to write, not because it is useful.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15061>
> _______________________________________
>

Is comparing passwords against a secure one not useful?
History
Date User Action Args
2012-06-15 07:50:29fijallsetrecipients: + fijall, loewis, arigo, ncoghlan, pitrou, christian.heimes, hynek
2012-06-15 07:50:29fijalllinkissue15061 messages
2012-06-15 07:50:29fijallcreate