Message162765
I don’t want to be the killjoy but I find it highly questionable to add a function that is advertised as "secure" while we can't fully grok the complexities at play. If we can't produce a provable secure one, we should scrub the function for good; or at least rename it somehow.
Unjustified perceived security is IMHO the worst possible case. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-06-14 10:02:47 | hynek | set | recipients:
+ hynek, arigo, pitrou, christian.heimes, fijall |
2012-06-14 10:02:47 | hynek | set | messageid: <1339668167.56.0.337598586431.issue15061@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-06-14 10:02:47 | hynek | link | issue15061 messages |
2012-06-14 10:02:46 | hynek | create | |
|