This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients Ramchandra Apte, amak, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, hynek, ncoghlan, pmoody, python-dev, sandro.tosi, terry.reedy, tshepang
Date 2012-06-04.23:41:59
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1338853320.25.0.406843080392.issue14814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Also noting a TODO item here: currently, the address-producing operations on network objects just produce vanilla address objects of the appropriate version. My question is, should we have those operations create interface objects instead?

My current thought is that the latter would lose less information, since you can easily strip the network details later if desired.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-06-04 23:42:00ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, giampaolo.rodola, amak, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, pmoody, sandro.tosi, tshepang, python-dev, Ramchandra Apte, hynek
2012-06-04 23:42:00ncoghlansetmessageid: <1338853320.25.0.406843080392.issue14814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-06-04 23:41:59ncoghlanlinkissue14814 messages
2012-06-04 23:41:59ncoghlancreate