Message 161440 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	jcea
Recipients	gregory.p.smith, jcea, pitrou
Date	2012-05-23.17:12:19
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1337793140.25.0.183397151719.issue14888@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Same can be said about Python 3 hash modules: they are not using the sanity check, so they work. Maybe the real question should be if the sanity check really makes sense at all. If not, remove everywhere (the calculated md5 with no checks looks correct, after all). If it makes sense, mark this as "python 3.2 and 3.3" and patch everywhere :). Do you agree, Antoine?

Same can be said about Python 3 hash modules: they are not using the sanity check, so they work.

Maybe the real question should be if the sanity check really makes sense at all. If not, remove everywhere (the calculated md5 with no checks looks correct, after all). If it makes sense, mark this as "python 3.2 and 3.3" and patch everywhere :).

Do you agree, Antoine?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-05-23 17:12:20	jcea	set	recipients: + jcea, gregory.p.smith, pitrou
2012-05-23 17:12:20	jcea	set	messageid: <1337793140.25.0.183397151719.issue14888@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-05-23 17:12:19	jcea	link	issue14888 messages
2012-05-23 17:12:19	jcea	create