Message160815
> Given that asyncore's design allows for a socket map to be passed in
> (at least in part - RDM's comment), ISTM that it should support this
> consistently, and also that smtpd should support this mode of use.
Well, I would argue that asyncore's design is thoroughly broken, and
passing a socket map is a poor kludge to avoid global state; in a
sophisticated event loop, the socket map wouldn't be the only piece of
state to pass around.
(look at twisted's reactors for a comparison) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-05-16 09:18:59 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, terry.reedy, vinay.sajip, giampaolo.rodola, r.david.murray, maker |
2012-05-16 09:18:58 | pitrou | link | issue11959 messages |
2012-05-16 09:18:58 | pitrou | create | |
|