Message160670
FTR I asked Julien to provide his opinion as a user and he agreed that having just one --byte-compile/--no-byte-compile option pair seemed better than the existing names (where --compile and --optimize are unrelated).
I wanted to avoid --byte-compile=0 to generate pyc, because I expected people to interpret it as “disabled” instead of “optimization level 0”. Thus the idea of using letters (and avoiding to use c and o as not all VMs have pyc and pyo files).
Note that the new spelling for --compile is the seemingly redundant --byte-compile=b, but that does not matter as it will be the default value so people won’t type it. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-05-14 22:12:16 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, tarek, Arfrever, alexis, Julien.Courteau |
2012-05-14 22:12:16 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1337033536.16.0.440469218818.issue13400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-05-14 22:12:15 | eric.araujo | link | issue13400 messages |
2012-05-14 22:12:15 | eric.araujo | create | |
|