Author thomaspinckney3
Recipients abacabadabacaba, antialize, eric.araujo, jjlee, nadeem.vawda, orsenthil, ruseel, serhiy.storchaka, thomaspinckney3
Date 2012-05-10.17:12:05
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1336669926.23.0.176905412563.issue1508475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
What if this gzip decompression was optional and controlled via a flag or handler instead of making it automagic?

It's not entirely trivial to implement so it is nice to have the option of this happening automatically if one wishes.

Then, the caller would be aware that Content-length / Accept-encoding / Content-encoding etc have been modified iff they requested gzip decompression.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-05-10 17:12:06thomaspinckney3setrecipients: + thomaspinckney3, jjlee, orsenthil, antialize, ruseel, nadeem.vawda, eric.araujo, abacabadabacaba, serhiy.storchaka
2012-05-10 17:12:06thomaspinckney3setmessageid: <1336669926.23.0.176905412563.issue1508475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-05-10 17:12:05thomaspinckney3linkissue1508475 messages
2012-05-10 17:12:05thomaspinckney3create