Author loewis
Recipients benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, loewis, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2012-05-02.15:54:04
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1335974045.28.0.671054253737.issue14656@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I was just attempting to provide a standard way of marking unreachable code.

I'm -1 for the proposed patch (and probably -0 on the general idea). I think the patch has the potential *introducing* new warnings, as compilers might warn that a return is lacking in these functions. 

I'm -0 on the general idea, as I think the status quo is just fine.

As for Victor's second use case (run-time checking that supposedly-unreachable code is indeed not reached, in release mode), I'm -0 also: we check that in debug mode; this looks sufficient to me.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-05-02 15:54:05loewissetrecipients: + loewis, georg.brandl, pitrou, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti
2012-05-02 15:54:05loewissetmessageid: <1335974045.28.0.671054253737.issue14656@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-05-02 15:54:04loewislinkissue14656 messages
2012-05-02 15:54:04loewiscreate