Message159805
> I was just attempting to provide a standard way of marking unreachable code.
I'm -1 for the proposed patch (and probably -0 on the general idea). I think the patch has the potential *introducing* new warnings, as compilers might warn that a return is lacking in these functions.
I'm -0 on the general idea, as I think the status quo is just fine.
As for Victor's second use case (run-time checking that supposedly-unreachable code is indeed not reached, in release mode), I'm -0 also: we check that in debug mode; this looks sufficient to me. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-05-02 15:54:05 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, georg.brandl, pitrou, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti |
2012-05-02 15:54:05 | loewis | set | messageid: <1335974045.28.0.671054253737.issue14656@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-05-02 15:54:04 | loewis | link | issue14656 messages |
2012-05-02 15:54:04 | loewis | create | |
|