➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author cbenoit
Recipients cbenoit, eric.araujo, tarek
Date 2012-05-02.12:41:20
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CADvsTj7GO+57-=MeLm=mubPdZdFaAG-ExZM99LOuBEt6Urw-jw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1335052176.77.0.973379319144.issue14517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
2012/4/22 Éric Araujo <report@bugs.python.org>

>
> Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org> added the comment:
>
> Is it #5372?
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14517>
> _______________________________________
>

Yes, I think so. The problem is :
For modules with a lot of .c, recompiling everything can take a very long
time...
In fact, it becomes very cumbersome for me and my co-workers...
Is there a way to make the previous check on timestamps optional?
History
Date User Action Args
2012-05-02 12:41:21cbenoitsetrecipients: + cbenoit, tarek, eric.araujo
2012-05-02 12:41:20cbenoitlinkissue14517 messages
2012-05-02 12:41:20cbenoitcreate