Author pitrou
Recipients neologix, pitrou, sbt, vstinner
Date 2012-04-25.15:16:54
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1335367014.75.0.69258586538.issue14666@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I don't think that you should call pthread_sigmask(). It looks like a
> workaround for this issue, whereas resource_sharer.stop() is the
> correct fix.

The problem is not only with test_multiprocessing and test_socket; any test which uses multiprocessing could have side effects on any subsequent tests which uses signals. Also, applicative code could be affected.

So I think pthread_sigmask() *is* the solution.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-04-25 15:16:54pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, vstinner, neologix, sbt
2012-04-25 15:16:54pitrousetmessageid: <1335367014.75.0.69258586538.issue14666@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-04-25 15:16:54pitroulinkissue14666 messages
2012-04-25 15:16:54pitroucreate