Message158801
Before starting to code, it is necessary to solve the problem of interface.
With the majority of the functions all is good, but the `link` and `rename` have two `dirfd` parameters (even with different names). So I suggest two more alternatives.
One is the filename and dirfd are combined in a tuple. Instead of a tuple, you can specify only the name.
link ((srcpath, srcdirfd), (dstpath, dstdirfd), *, followlinks=True)
The other -- `dirfd`s are combined in a tuple. You can specify a number, then `dirfd` is the same for both filenames.
link (srcpath, dstpath, *, followlinks=True, dirfd=(srcdirfd, dstdirfd))
Which of these options (or the original, with different keywords) is preferable? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-04-20 06:52:54 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, larry, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, r.david.murray |
2012-04-20 06:52:54 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1334904774.81.0.0673772186109.issue14626@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-04-20 06:52:54 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue14626 messages |
2012-04-20 06:52:54 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |
|