Message158663
I see Alexander is going to take care of this. But to clarify what I suggested for your information:
In an ideal world it would be a committer doing the patch review, followed by a checkin. But in the real world there aren't enough of us with enough time to get to all the bugs with patches. You asked how to move it along and I suggested one way: get someone else to do a review. I wouldn't say that the submitter recruiting a reviewer was a "normal" process, but it is a way to get bugs unstuck. And we get reviews from non-committers frequently (it is a step along the path to becoming a committer...quality reviews are as important as quality patches).
I don't think there's anything in the devguide about this particular nuance. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-04-18 21:05:20 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, georg.brandl, belopolsky, Alexander.Belopolsky, lavajoe |
2012-04-18 21:05:20 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1334783120.28.0.255077393481.issue10941@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-04-18 21:05:19 | r.david.murray | link | issue10941 messages |
2012-04-18 21:05:19 | r.david.murray | create | |
|