Message158144
Yes, this is all by design. The interpreter *has* to stop: either it stops in a controlled way (the fatal error) or the stack is blown and it crashes. If you think the fatal error (basically a C abort() call) should be replaced with another way of exiting, please suggest so.
(actually, it's not the interpreter as a whole, only the current thread, but crashing a thread without affecting the others is probably impossible, due to reference leaks, resource cleanup, etc.) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-04-12 16:01:54 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, terry.reedy, kbk, gregorlingl, dino.viehland, r.david.murray, asvetlov, flupke, Peter.Wentworth, Emmanuel.Decitre |
2012-04-12 16:01:54 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1334246514.82.0.304665020381.issue6717@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-04-12 16:01:54 | pitrou | link | issue6717 messages |
2012-04-12 16:01:54 | pitrou | create | |
|