This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients Jim.Jewett, Mark.Shannon, benjamin.peterson, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jcon, pitrou, pjenvey, rhettinger, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date 2012-04-04.11:34:04
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1333538931.3503.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> I'm not bothered by the regression in "silent_logging",
> as it is a micro benchmark with a very short running time.

I'm not concerned about the micro-benchmark itself but the fact that it
might hint at a wider problem.
Also, I don't get your remark about it running in a short time. Your
patch AFAICT doesn't need any warm up period to exhibit any

> Reducing the method-cache size from 2**10 to 2**9 allows the working
> set to fit better in the cache.
> This fixes the regression in "mako", but makes OO programs that use
> few objects (such as richards) a bit slower.

I don't think we should reduce the size of the method cache. 1024 is not
a very large number, and might even be too small for complex OO

I also think that, apart from the dict storage changes, your patch
should strive not to change any other tunables. Otherwise we're really
comparing apples to oranges.
Date User Action Args
2012-04-04 11:34:05pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, jcea, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, pjenvey, benjamin.peterson, Mark.Shannon, jcon, Jim.Jewett
2012-04-04 11:34:05pitroulinkissue13903 messages
2012-04-04 11:34:04pitroucreate