Author pitrou
Recipients asvetlov, brian.curtin, pitrou, tim.golden
Date 2012-04-03.15:05:12
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1333465201.3382.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1333463926.18.0.62076489311.issue14484@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> As for the second point, why else are you calling os.kill if you don't
> want to kill the given process? I don't disagree that it's on the
> perverse side, but that's the functionality available. Perhaps we
> should *not* have the fallback and only operate on the signals?

I just meant that exiting with 0 isn't exactly expected when a process
is forcibly killed (0 meaning success, as far as I know).
History
Date User Action Args
2012-04-03 15:05:13pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, tim.golden, brian.curtin, asvetlov
2012-04-03 15:05:12pitroulinkissue14484 messages
2012-04-03 15:05:12pitroucreate