Message156983
Your presumption is probably correct, however if that is the premise of the patch it is incorrect in detail, since we've already fixed test_queue specifically to be runnable with -m unittest without adding a load_tests. I haven't looked at the other modules Matt is looking at, but it may well be that they can also be fixed without a load_tests.
The test_queue fix is issue 14333, also opened by Matt, but fixed by Michele.
I think we should make the tests runnable by unittest, but that we should use load_tests only if making discovery work for a particular test is too invasive. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-03-28 15:44:50 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, eric.araujo, michael.foord, anacrolix |
2012-03-28 15:44:50 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1332949490.34.0.73394783725.issue14408@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-03-28 15:44:49 | r.david.murray | link | issue14408 messages |
2012-03-28 15:44:49 | r.david.murray | create | |
|