Message156796
[haypo]
> dictproxy() doesn't need to be a public builtin type.
+1
> We can just implement its constructor without documenting the type.
+1
> Or it may be exposed in a module like collections.
Please don't use collections as a dumping ground for this sort of thing. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-03-26 03:10:56 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, gvanrossum, vstinner, r.david.murray, eric.snow, Jim.Jewett |
2012-03-26 03:10:56 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1332731456.1.0.21383185622.issue14386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-03-26 03:10:55 | rhettinger | link | issue14386 messages |
2012-03-26 03:10:55 | rhettinger | create | |
|