This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients Jim.Jewett, eric.snow, gvanrossum, r.david.murray, rhettinger, vstinner
Date 2012-03-26.03:10:55
SpamBayes Score 0.001397236
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1332731456.1.0.21383185622.issue14386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
[haypo]
> dictproxy() doesn't need to be a public builtin type.

+1
 
> We can just implement its constructor without documenting the type.

+1

> Or it may be exposed in a module like collections.

Please don't use collections as a dumping ground for this sort of thing.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-03-26 03:10:56rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, gvanrossum, vstinner, r.david.murray, eric.snow, Jim.Jewett
2012-03-26 03:10:56rhettingersetmessageid: <1332731456.1.0.21383185622.issue14386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-03-26 03:10:55rhettingerlinkissue14386 messages
2012-03-26 03:10:55rhettingercreate