Message156792
Given that dictproxy is needed to implement the proper interface for classes I don't think it is an implementation detail, and so I think it ought to be constructable. We have more esoteric types constructable (e.g. function).
I also happen to think that its use to implement classes is a pretty darn good use case, and I am sure there are other use cases.
I don't really care if we make it a builtin but there should be a standard name for it somewhere in the stdlib. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-03-26 00:23:40 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, rhettinger, vstinner, r.david.murray, eric.snow, Jim.Jewett |
2012-03-26 00:23:39 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1332721419.83.0.00802917880461.issue14386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-03-26 00:23:39 | gvanrossum | link | issue14386 messages |
2012-03-26 00:23:38 | gvanrossum | create | |
|