Message156789
> It's clutter and we should show some restraint before adding new types.
dictproxy() doesn't need to be a public builtin type. We can just implement its constructor without documenting the type. Or it may be exposed in a module like collections. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-03-25 23:54:25 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, gvanrossum, rhettinger, r.david.murray, eric.snow, Jim.Jewett |
2012-03-25 23:54:25 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1332719665.2.0.970084686701.issue14386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-03-25 23:54:24 | vstinner | link | issue14386 messages |
2012-03-25 23:54:24 | vstinner | create | |
|