Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, eric.araujo, loewis, nadeem.vawda, neologix, pitrou, rosslagerwall
Date 2012-03-20.19:05:54
SpamBayes Score 5.00254e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1332270077.3440.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <CAH_1eM33jOzVS26Wr-6pK5YXKHoOz11VgH2Yi=9eDcRbvMqdWA@mail.gmail.com>
Content
> I agree with Martin: we really do handle the signal, and as such, the
> only way to convey the relevant information to the parent as to which
> signal caused the exit would be to re-raise it, which is really ugly
> and probably not a good idea.

Why would it be ugly? faulthandler does exactly that.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-03-20 19:05:55pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, nadeem.vawda, eric.araujo, Arfrever, neologix, rosslagerwall
2012-03-20 19:05:54pitroulinkissue14229 messages
2012-03-20 19:05:54pitroucreate