This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ezio.melotti
Recipients dmalcolm, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, loewis, nadeem.vawda, orsenthil, terry.reedy, tshepang
Date 2012-03-15.00:37:28
SpamBayes Score 8.805175e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1331771849.69.0.373186334573.issue13963@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Most of the patches are against 3.2 or 2.7, so applying them to "default" might fail.
If we specify the correct branch, rietveld should be able to apply them cleanly to the head of the branch even without knowing the exact revision (so even with git-style diff).  This might still fail if the files affected by the patch changed in the meanwhile, but that shouldn't happen very often.
If this is true, we could simply add a way to specify the branch (either a dropdown in the roundup UI or an X.Y in the filename).  This might also be used to avoid conflicts when the same patch is submitted for different branches.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-03-15 00:37:29ezio.melottisetrecipients: + ezio.melotti, loewis, terry.reedy, orsenthil, nadeem.vawda, eric.araujo, dmalcolm, tshepang
2012-03-15 00:37:29ezio.melottisetmessageid: <1331771849.69.0.373186334573.issue13963@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-03-15 00:37:28ezio.melottilinkissue13963 messages
2012-03-15 00:37:28ezio.melotticreate