Message 155556 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	jafo
Recipients	asksol, jafo, jnoller, nirai, ysj.ray
Date	2012-03-13.02:04:00
SpamBayes Score	3.969792e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1331604241.8.0.875407879799.issue10037@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
The attached patch does change the semantics somewhat, but I don't fully understand how much. In particular: It changes the "get()" call to be turned into "get(timeout=1.0)" if inqueue doesn't have a _reader attribute. In the case that inqueue doesn't have a _reader attribute, and "inqueue._reader.poll(timeout)" is false, "get()" isn't called at all. It introduces a continue. I'd want Jesse to pronounce on this.

The attached patch does change the semantics somewhat, but I don't fully understand how much.  In particular:

It changes the "get()" call to be turned into "get(timeout=1.0)" if inqueue doesn't have a _reader attribute.
In the case that inqueue doesn't have a _reader attribute, and "inqueue._reader.poll(timeout)" is false, "get()" isn't called at all.
It introduces a continue.

I'd want Jesse to pronounce on this.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-03-13 02:04:01	jafo	set	recipients: + jafo, jnoller, nirai, asksol, ysj.ray
2012-03-13 02:04:01	jafo	set	messageid: <1331604241.8.0.875407879799.issue10037@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-03-13 02:04:01	jafo	link	issue10037 messages
2012-03-13 02:04:00	jafo	create