Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, gvanrossum, larry, loewis, pitrou, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, vstinner
Date 2012-03-04.00:50:52
SpamBayes Score 0.00750017
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1330822016.3362.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1330822118.97.0.901425898721.issue14127@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> I grant you that (int, float) is probably, theoretically better than
> (int, int).  But it's academic as Guido has ruled against anything but
> a straight int representing nanoseconds, and I doubt he's gonna change
> his mind.

Why not let Guido speak out?
History
Date User Action Args
2012-03-04 00:50:53pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, loewis, vstinner, larry, Arfrever, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall
2012-03-04 00:50:52pitroulinkissue14127 messages
2012-03-04 00:50:52pitroucreate