Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, gvanrossum, larry, loewis, pitrou, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, vstinner
Date 2012-03-04.00:43:12
SpamBayes Score 0.00204951
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1330821556.3362.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1330821623.92.0.41442786008.issue14127@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Well, Guido has already nixed future-proof formats, see his comments
> above:

I don't think Guido is *against* future-proof formats per se, he's
against them when they have a cost compared to non future-proof ones.

The proposal I made (a (integral part, float fractional part) tuple)
doesn't have a cost compared to the plain (int seconds, int nanoseconds)
tuple proposal.
(of course, you can also have nanoseconds as a float, but that starts
being weird)
History
Date User Action Args
2012-03-04 00:43:13pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, loewis, vstinner, larry, Arfrever, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall
2012-03-04 00:43:12pitroulinkissue14127 messages
2012-03-04 00:43:12pitroucreate