This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients ethan.furman, ncoghlan
Date 2012-02-28.23:00:31
SpamBayes Score 1.4954332e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1330470032.4.0.693972542446.issue14136@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Hah, I've been dealing with Python's regression test suite for 8+ years and there are still cases where I don't understand the rationale for testing things a particular way (beyond "it must have seemed like a good idea at the time"). It has a lot more historical cruft than the standard library does :)

The "proper" location for a particular test can be a bit of a coin toss in many cases, but one useful guide (which applies in this case) is to try to avoid adding *new* standard library dependencies to a test module if there's an alternate suitable location that already has those dependencies.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-02-28 23:00:32ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, ethan.furman
2012-02-28 23:00:32ncoghlansetmessageid: <1330470032.4.0.693972542446.issue14136@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-02-28 23:00:31ncoghlanlinkissue14136 messages
2012-02-28 23:00:31ncoghlancreate