Message154218
On 25/02/2012 08:09, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Even if they know the meaning of "shallow" (which is not a really common word AFAICT)
FWIW it's pretty much the only way of saying what it means.
I've no idea how many people used it last year or anything,
but if I needed to express the concept of the opposite of
deep I would struggle to find another word. Except, perhaps,
the doublespeak-like "not deep". Undeep? Double-plus undeep? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-02-25 09:18:30 | tim.golden | set | recipients:
+ tim.golden, terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, docs@python, tshepang |
2012-02-25 09:18:30 | tim.golden | link | issue14112 messages |
2012-02-25 09:18:30 | tim.golden | create | |
|