Message 154064 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	robodan
Recipients	eric.araujo, eric.smith, robodan, vinay.sajip
Date	2012-02-23.14:47:35
SpamBayes Score	0.00013411904
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1330008456.13.0.707927106957.issue1521950@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I haven't been following this much. Sorry. My day job isn't in this area any more (and I'm stuck using 2.4 :-(). Looking at the docs, I notice the "old" is different from what it used to be. Notably: 'e;' gets split into two tokens; and ">'abc';" gets split into 3. I'm pretty sure that baseline code doesn't split those at all. So there is a question of if "old" is fully backward compatible. The "new" functionality looks great. That's what I was looking for when I filed the bug. Thank you! -Dan

I haven't been following this much.  Sorry.  My day job isn't in this area any more (and I'm stuck using 2.4 :-().

Looking at the docs, I notice the "old" is different from what it used to be.  Notably: 'e;' gets split into two tokens; and ">'abc';" gets split into 3.  I'm pretty sure that baseline code doesn't split those at all.  So there is a question of if "old" is fully backward compatible.

The "new" functionality looks great.  That's what I was looking for when I filed the bug.

Thank you!
-Dan

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-02-23 14:47:36	robodan	set	recipients: + robodan, vinay.sajip, eric.smith, eric.araujo
2012-02-23 14:47:36	robodan	set	messageid: <1330008456.13.0.707927106957.issue1521950@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-02-23 14:47:35	robodan	link	issue1521950 messages
2012-02-23 14:47:35	robodan	create