Author barry
Recipients Arach, Arfrever, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, Mark.Shannon, PaulMcMillan, Zhiping.Deng, alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, eric.araujo, eric.snow, fx5, georg.brandl, grahamd, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, gz, jcea, lemburg, loewis, mark.dickinson, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, skorgu, skrah, terry.reedy, tim.peters, v+python, vstinner, zbysz
Date 2012-02-21.15:42:33
SpamBayes Score 7.2348e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
On Feb 21, 2012, at 09:48 AM, Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote:

>The flag should probably be removed - simply because
>the env var is not a flag, it's a configuration parameter.
>Exposing the seed value as sys.hashseed would be better and more useful
>to applications.

Okay, after chatting with __ap__ on irc, here's what I think the behavior
should be:

sys.flags.hash_randomization should contain just the value given by the -R
flag.  It should only be True if the flag is present, False otherwise.

sys.hash_seed contains the hash seed, set by virtue of the flag or envar.  It
should contain the *actual* seed value used.  E.g. it might be zero, the
explicitly set integer, or the randomly selected seed value in use during this
Python execution if a random seed was requested.

If you really need the envar value, getenv('PYTHONHASHSEED') is good enough
for that.
Date User Action Args
2012-02-21 15:42:34barrysetrecipients: + barry, lemburg, gvanrossum, tim.peters, loewis, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, grahamd, Arfrever, v+python, alex, zbysz, skrah, dmalcolm, gz, neologix, Arach, Mark.Shannon, python-dev, eric.snow, Zhiping.Deng, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, PaulMcMillan, fx5, skorgu
2012-02-21 15:42:33barrylinkissue13703 messages
2012-02-21 15:42:33barrycreate