This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author petri.lehtinen
Recipients Nebelhom, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, fdrake, ghaering, petri.lehtinen
Date 2012-02-12.19:23:18
SpamBayes Score 4.1178103e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1329074599.03.0.56858018181.issue13491@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> > In the Doc/includes/sqlite3 directory there are still some scripts that require the
> > createdb.py, so I didn't nuke the file.
>
> Do these scripts (or a README file) explain about createdb.py?

No. There's no mention of createdb.py anywhere.

> > I also removed the strange "The arguments to :meth:`executescript` must be :func:`bytes`
> > objects" sentence from the patch. I assume it was a mistake, as it's wrong.
>
> Why not change it so that it’s correct?  (Maybe looking at the file history would
> show where the mistake comes from.)

It's just not in the history, it was only in OP's patch. And it's wrong, as executescript() takes an str argument, not bytes.

Having slept over this, I think execute_1.py and execute_2.py should be merged as one file, as after my patch, execute_2.py would not be runnable by itself.

This would also be a good chance to look at all the examples and have them cleaned up. That could also be a separate patch.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-02-12 19:23:19petri.lehtinensetrecipients: + petri.lehtinen, fdrake, ghaering, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, docs@python, Nebelhom
2012-02-12 19:23:19petri.lehtinensetmessageid: <1329074599.03.0.56858018181.issue13491@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-02-12 19:23:18petri.lehtinenlinkissue13491 messages
2012-02-12 19:23:18petri.lehtinencreate