Author ezio.melotti
Recipients anasofiapaixao, dcbbcd, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, ncoghlan, rhettinger, terry.reedy
Date 2012-01-29.15:44:55
SpamBayes Score 0.00286914
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
> One other point... the branch is actually now relative to default, not
> 3.2. While that was due to a merging mistake on my part, it also means
> I can legitimately ignore the narrow/wide build distinction in the
> section on strings.

So will this go on 3.3 only or are you planning to push it on 3.2(/2.7) too?
Date User Action Args
2012-01-29 15:44:56ezio.melottisetrecipients: + ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, rhettinger, terry.reedy, dcbbcd, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, docs@python, anasofiapaixao
2012-01-29 15:44:56ezio.melottisetmessageid: <>
2012-01-29 15:44:55ezio.melottilinkissue4966 messages
2012-01-29 15:44:55ezio.melotticreate