Message152211
So, to my reading of teh compatibility PEP this cannot be added wholesale,
unless there is a pure Python version as well. However, if it replaced re
(read: patched) it would be valid.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Nick Coghlan <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:
>
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> As part of the PEP 408 discussions, Guido approved the addition of 'regex'
> in 3.3 (using that name, rather than as a drop-in replacement for re) [1,2]
>
> That should greatly ease the backwards compatibility concerns, even if it
> isn't as transparent an upgrade path.
>
> [1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115961.html
> [2] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115962.html
>
> ----------
> nosy: +ncoghlan
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2636>
> _______________________________________
> |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-01-29 06:28:44 | alex | set | recipients:
+ alex, loewis, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jimjjewett, sjmachin, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, belopolsky, pitrou, nneonneo, giampaolo.rodola, rsc, timehorse, mark, vbr, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, jaylogan, akitada, moreati, steven.daprano, r.david.murray, jacques, zdwiel, jhalcrow, stiv, davide.rizzo, mattchaput, ronnix, eric.snow, akoumjian |
2012-01-29 06:28:40 | alex | link | issue2636 messages |
2012-01-29 06:28:40 | alex | create | |
|