Message152188
> a) Make all functions and the two buffer access macros part
> of the limited API again.
Hmm, I don't think buffer access macros should be part of the limited
API. If they are truely important (which I doubt), we should have
equivalent functions for them.
> I think it might be OK to defer the decision about Py_MEMORYVIEW_C etc.,
> since the comment already says "... Don't access their fields directly.".
My question is whether there is any point in making these flags. Does
3rd-party code want to manipulate memoryview internals, instead of
querying the Py_buffer?
(and of course the memoryview object is becoming more and more like
another Py_buffer :-)) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-01-28 20:59:27 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, teoliphant, paul.moore, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, rupole, kristjan.jonsson, vstinner, pv, skrah, jcon, petri.lehtinen |
2012-01-28 20:59:27 | pitrou | link | issue10181 messages |
2012-01-28 20:59:26 | pitrou | create | |
|